Inception: Loss and Deception

It seems the Nolan hype machine, made up of his recently joined comic book fanboys who believe they have reached a higher ground of cinema through his unique artistic power, is still in full force. I have already read and heard many of them say that Inception is “the greatest film.” These were the same people who said that Nolan’s dreary 2009 The Dark Knight was also “the greatest film.” I must disagree with their sentiment.

Just because a director cuts predictable corners and makes us think doesn’t mean his films deserve top ten ratings. Personally, I felt that Dark Knight was a messy film with an unclear message. It pulsed with energy, was unpredictable and challenging, but it was also confusingly plotted and couldn’t seem to focus on any one idea. It was joyless and had a deplorably melodramatic ending. Nolan’s earlier Batman Begins will always be a greater film in my mind, due to its far more engaging plotting and beautiful symbolism. Don’t get me wrong, Nolan is a great director and Inception is a great film. It would just be greater if people saw it for what it is and quit worshiping it as “the best.”

On its surface, Inception is a science fiction heist film with Matrix overtones. That it trumps the The Matrix in almost every way is only the first of many feathers in its cap. Instead of edgy fight scenes, we get acrobatic air dances and rushed wanderings through haunting structures and empty spaces. In the dream worlds of Inception, death is a mere annoyance and isn’t as dangerous as mental breakdown. The stakes are high, but hard to comprehend.

As the film progresses and the stakes are raised, the sci-fi dream heist becomes a sub-plot amidst a deeper struggle. Two of the main characters come face to face with their deeply held senses of loss, and how they choose to deal with these losses is the center of the film’s message: to have peace in life, one must let go. This letting go involves graceful forgiveness, both to self and others, but at its core I find an unsatisfying denial of truth. Again and again I find this theme in Hollywood films. When someone has no hope of an after-life, the reality of death and the loss it brings is truly the most terrifying thing. The characters of Inception attempt to block this reality with unreality, but it’s impossible. The only answer is found in facing it, and then moving on, which they might, or might not do.

I found an interesting parallel in Inception to Lewis’s novel The Silver Chair. As the hero of the film descends deeper into the dreamworld, he encounters an enchanting woman who begs him to stay in what she calls the “real world,” just as the Green Lady in Silver Chair lies to the children, telling them that their world is only a dream. Satan tries to tell us this every day, that the kingdom of Christ is a fairy tale, and only his dark kingdom is real. I find it extremely sad that such a perceptive filmmaker as Nolan can represent this deceit in a film, but can’t bring it to its ultimate conclusion, nor apply it to his own life. Such is the tempter’s power.

Like Dark Knight, and Nolan’s earlier The Prestige, Inception isn’t as fun as it is engaging. The audience I sat with gasped and tried to breath through its pounding, non-stop scenes of mysterious, tense action and psychological conflict. The ending is both relieving and startling. It left us cheering. Though definitely not “The best film,” Christopher Nolan has once again made a solid one.

Predators: Quantity Doesn’t Equal Quality

Why is Adrien Brody playing a tough-as-nails mercenary in this film? He sounds like he’s channeling Christian Bail’s laughable Batman voice from “The Dark Knight,” and I don’t believe his performance for a second. Maybe the director thought it would be funny to cast an actor known for his emotionally sensitive roles as Schwarzenegger mark 2, but the audience I sat with wasn’t laughing.

I saw the original “Predator” on a tiny screen in a van driving from South Carolina to Chicago at two in the morning, and it was still a more entertaining experience. The original film was all about atmosphere, the foreboding feeling of being pursued by unseen forces, and Schwarzenegger made the film tick with his strong physical performance. All this film has to offer is a handful of boring stereotype characters wandering around in a jungle, punctuated with lame fight scenes and goofy violence.

Every time I go to the cinema I hate the concept of film franchises a little more. After watching M. Night’s newest lameness a few weeks ago, which “ended” with a “to be continued,” I realized that modern Hollywood is less interested in entertaining than it is in creating money-making serials. Never mind an absence of compelling story or proper ending, tune in next year to see what happens next! That this film has no ending isn’t as offensive as its final climax, which is a shot-for-shot rip-off of the original Predator climax. “But there are TWO PREDATORS fighting,” you may say. Yeah, just like there were two mummies in Universal’s awful fifth mummy film, “The Mummy’s Curse.” Changing the quantities of things doesn’t make a sequel original.

The one bright spot in this mess was Laurence Fishburne’s engaging performance as a crazy Predator impersonator. I wanted the film to be about him, but I guess he was just too original to headline this rip-off film.

New Short Film Project

My friend Mike and I are working on a new short film. We don’t have a title yet, but it’s about a man with a camera for a head. We spent the afternoon shooting up in the mountains of North Carolina, and got about half the film shot. Here’s a little “cast photo” we took.

I was lucky enough to be the one to don the elaborate camera head that we created and play the camera-man. It’s not very fun to be basically blind and walking on treacherous mountain trails! Here’s a little teaser of what the camera-man looks like.

We hope to have the film finished in the next two weeks.

Sugar Mountain: Pulling a “Philip Bloom”

Three years ago I bumped into Philip Bloom’s website. I was greatly inspired by his work, especially the way he captured a location on video so that I felt I’d been there. His Canon HV20 test film inspired me to purchase an HV20 of my own, and I’ve been loving it ever since. Early this Spring my friend Mike and I went skiing at Sugar Mountain in North Carolina. Mike skied while I captured the locale on tape. I just finished editing my footage and I must say that I feel I have successfully pulled a “Philip Bloom.”

Check out “Sugar Mountain” by clicking Here.

Hobbit News

Two of my favorite film directors, Guillermo Del Torro and Peter Jackson are working together to create a true-to-the-book film adaptation of J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit. I just found some fragments of an interview the two did for Empire Magazine. Take a look:

Jackson: We do cover some of the events earlier, like Thrain, Thorin’s father, and we’re sort of fleshing out the Hobbit and expanding it sideways, up and down. We just decided it would be a mistake to try to cram everything into one movie. The essential brief was to do The Hobbit and it allows us to make the Hobbit in a little more of the style, if you like, of the trilogy, too.
Del Toro: To make a movie of the Hobbit that didn’t go over three hours.
Jackson: You would be rushing along…
Del Toro: You would be losing iconic moments. The animated version avoids Beorn, who is a great character, and some people always feel that you should lose the Spiders (of Mirkwood), or this or that. We wanted to keep every iconic moment that was in the book and give it some weight.

Empire: How are you going to handle the dwarves, many of whom aren’t fleshed out in the book?
Del Toro: There is a very specific function that Gimli had in the trilogy. And technically and expressively, the dwarves in The Hobbit serve another. They have to become valiant, brave, sometimes funny – and yes, all of those were in Gimli, but there are moments in which the dwarves have to be tragic, or they have to be incredibly moving. Those dwarves, physically and dramatically, will work like three-dimensional characters that will as soon make you laugh as they will make you fear for their lives, or they will move you. Hopefully to tears, in some instances…
Jackson: We’re going to choose five or six, pretty similar to the ones that Tolkien spends a bit more time on in the book, and develop some quite interesting relationships between them and Bilbo. We don’t want them to be just Thorin plus 12 comedic sidekicks.

Jackson: What I think everybody has to get right in their minds is that we’re creating a Middle-earth that’s pretty much the same as the trilogy’s Middle-earth. Hobbiton is going to look like the same place. Hobbits are going to look the same. But it’s another guy going in with his own filmmaking style. That’s why I think this could be a better idea for him to direct these films than me. Let’s all see what somebody else does with Middle-earth. Let’s go in there with another director and another set of lenses and another cameraman, and see what they do with it. I think that’s exciting. He’s not pretending to be me. People have got to get that into their heads.

I’m glad they’re going for continuity but not compromiseing the book. Also, it’s good to hear that they’re going to focus on developing the dwarves, something that they had trouble with in the LOTR series with Gimli. Maybe they’ll use less prosthetics? After reading this I’m a lot more excited about this film than I was before!

Bexhill-On-Sea

Phillip Bloom is one of my heroes. He’s a digital cinematographer who uses high-end HD camcorders with 35mm lens adapters to decrease the depth of field, achieving a more selective focus, film look. I really like his work, not only his image quality but his editing and use of music to evoke mood. His favorite subject is everyday people, whom he shoots going about their everyday lives in slow motion, showing us their true humanity and character. His website is packed with great videos, but he’s just done it again with Bexhill-On-Sea, a moody picture of a beach side resort, it’s landscapes and inhabitants. Click here to watch it.

Yesteryear Test Animations

I’ve been working on a sci-fi story concept. It’s called Yesteryear and is set in the late 1920s. I’m trying to give it a 1930s Saturday morning serial feel, including the both the design and the film quality. Here are some test shots I’ve animated.

Bi-Plane

Robot Army

Honoring The Brave Dead

Don’t believe all the bad reviews, Valkyrie is a good film. Not a great film, but a good one. X-Men and Superman Returns director Bryan Singer leaves the fan-boy realm behind for more serious fare, and he does not disappoint.

Not at all a heartwarming holiday film, Valkyrie is based on the true story of the last and most complex attempt by high ranking German officers to assassinate Hitler. The mission, which employed an operation called “Valkyrie,” obviously failed. The film is closely focused on that failure and it’s aftermath.

Everyone seems to rip on Tom Cruise, which I just don’t understand. I think he’s solid in this film, as well as most of the other films I’ve seen him in. He brings an energy and an intensity to the role of Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg, one of the key conspirators in the attempt, that I can really get behind. People who judge an actor’s performance based solely on who they are in real life really bug me!

I was most impressed by the way the film stuck to the facts. That Valkyrie has no major action sequences and is shot mostly in medium and close-ups testifies that Singer wasn’t trying to squeeze an epic or an action flick out of real events. He instead focuses on the tension and anti-climax of a failed endeavor in a very realistic manner, creating an enlightening, if not an exhaustive historical drama.

It’s no spoiler to say that Cruise’s character, along with the other conspirators, die in the end, but they die bravely, and I think that this is the point of the film. It’s not necessarily meant to entertain, but to honor these brave men who sacrificed themselves in an attempt to destroy a great evil. When the credits rolled the audience was silent, clearly as affected as I was. Valkyrie is a solid film that does it’s job well. Kudos to Singer for spending his time and talent in honoring these brave men.

The Age of Disney Live-Action

In the 60s and 70s Walt Disney Studios produced an array of live action family films. I grew up watching these films: “That Darn Cat,” “Blackbeard’s Ghost,” “The Apple Dumpling Gang,” and my personal favorite, “The Love Bug,” starring that most endearing of Volkswagen Beetles, Herbie. I remember going to the library every week or so and checking out another one, and making popcorn and watching them as a family. I think one of the reasons I’m studying film-making today is because of how important these films were to me. They weren’t the most intelligent or artistically made, but they told fun, fantastic stories focused mainly on characters, not on special affects like many family films today. I find it interesting that Disney managed to make so many successful films that were still suitable for the entire family. Not as easy to do today apparently.

Turner movie classics is airing a series of 27 of these films over the holiday season, plus a documentary on them called “The Age Of Believing: The Disney Live-Action Classics.” Their website here has clips and synopsises for each film and is a real blast from the past. I really have to watch some of these again.

Shooting Ridgeback

A crisp November afternoon in South Carolina. We wait on the lawn outside of Unusual Films for our actor. When he arrives, we pile into James Lee’s big red luxury van and trundle across the border into the North Carolina mountains. On the way, we swap stories of films and film projects we’ve worked on, typing at laptops, twiddling with ipods and just generally enjoying the fall landscape. As the we approach the mountains, highways become narrow winding roads and we begin to climb higher and higher, the flat landscape we came from unfolding below us through flashing orange and golden leaves. almost two hours in, we’re very high, leaning dangerously on the curves over steep wooded ravines. We pull up at a gravel road and hike the heavy equipment in, up a forested path of rocks. We reach an outcropping and a mass of giant boulders that we have to climb, passing the fragile film equipment up piece by piece. Over a little bridge that spans a narrow gap and out onto a huge rock, we’ve reached our destination, a mountain ridgeback, jutting out of the forested hills and affording a gorgeous view of red and yellow trees  descending like streams into the purple plains and rivers below. The sky is pure blue, the air crisp and clean. We wait for the sun to lower, huddling under our hoodies from the growing chill. Then, when the sun is just right, when magic hour makes the distant landscape recedes into a glowing purple, we start into our shoot. It is a good day to be a film student.

"Film is life, too"

Christopher Doyle is one of my favorite cinematographers. His work in the Jet Li film “Hero” is exquisite, as is his cinematography in “Lady In The Water,” the one redeeming feature of that film. I just recently heard of another martial arts flick he made back in the 90’s called “Ashes of Time” — I can’t wait to see it! Half out of his mind and obsessed with globetrotting, Doyle says a lot of crazy things about filmmaking, but occasionally he says something really insightful. Here he’s being interviewed by icf.com for his work on “Paranoid Park.” This is what he has to say about working in the film environment:

“… Most films actually do make themselves. How well they make themselves depends on our openness to, and global understanding of, all the elements that contribute to a “work.” The actors respond to a space. The production designer and the director and cinematographer have chosen or manipulated or created the space. The light defines the space, but if the light is “natural,” it may be temperamental… changing in unexpected ways… and what if the actors are new to their craft? And what if someone falls ill? The parameters have to be engaged. Film is life, too… I try to “go with the flow.”

So cool! Filmmaking really is the most improvised of all art forms. No matter how hard you plan, the space you shoot in and the actors playing the parts will always change things. Some of the greatest cinematic art comes out of these unavoidable, improvised changes. Film really is a lot like life. If you’re like Doyle, you’ll just “go with the flow;” but even the most controlling directors must improvise from time to time–it’s what makes cinema such a unique art form.

Watchmen Trailer Music

I’m not a big Smashing Pumpkins fan, but the trailer for the new highbrow superhero flick “The Watchmen” features their song “The End is the Beginning is the End”–and its awesome!

Send a heartbeat to
The void that cries through you
The pale princess of a palace cracked
And now the kingdom comes
The world is lost and blown
And we are flesh and blood disintegrate
And in your darkest hour
I hold secrets flame
We can watch the world devoured in its pain

“God help us all”
“The world will look up and shout, “save us” and I’ll whisper ‘no.’ ”

Melodramatic shivers! I love it when visuals work so well with lyrics. Plus, nothing can put me in cinematic catharsis like a solidly edited trailer. Will “The Watchmen” be any good? I haven’t read the comic its based on, so I really can’t say, but regardless, this trailer is pretty sweet, visuals and music.
Check out the trailer here.

Three Incredible, Crazy Projects!

Life has been extremely crazy-hectic for me these past few weeks! I’m involved with three incredible projects that have been taking up all of my free time, and some of my homework time too! (contorts face in mock pain)

Project 1: James Lee’s senior film. Its called “Ridgeback” and involves a monster in a crate. That’s all I’m at liberty to say right now. My job on the project is assistant set designer. Basically, James designs the sets and I offer helpful advice. Mostly, I’ve been cutting old wood up to nail to the walls of the “backstage” set that we’re in the process of building, which is turning out to be really amazing! Check out this picture!

Project 2: The Silver Chair. This is really going to be cool. It’s a one-hour adaptation of one of C. S. Lewis’s classic Narnia stories and we’re performing it on a minimalist set under a gazebo at night! Sam Gubitz, an incredibly crazy woman, is the creator and director and we’ve been practicing about 9 hours each week. I’m playing the part of Eustace Scrub. Its been demanding, but a lot of fun.

Project 3: Project London. One of my brilliant internet associates, Ian Hubert, along with producer Phil McCoy and Spiral Productions, are making a highly epic sci/fi flick up in Washington state. I managed to get a volunteer job on the crew doing sync work. I’ll be getting footage in the mail soon, which I’ll sync audio too. Not the most exciting job, but I’m still really pumped to be on the crew of such a potentially awesome film. Check out the project’s blog site here.

So yeah, lots of stuff going on for me right now. Life will be simpler after Silver Chair is over in November, but I’m loving every minute of it, I’m going on an on-location mountain shoot with James Lee this Saturday in North Carolina, which will be an incredible experience, and  when I get the footage from Project London, I’m sure I’ll be really busy with that too. All in all I feel very blessed to have all these projects to work on and learn from.

The Ills of Popular Cinema or, “Franchise Killed the Originality Star”

I’ve been reading about “The Hobbit” film adaptation. Apparently, Tolkien’s son doesn’t want to see it made, and is pressing fraud charges against New Line Cinema. Guillermo Del Toro, the much touted director of the film, is making all sorts of ruckus in the media about which actors he will cast to play the parts and what crazy plans he has for creature effects. Meanwhile, fans everywhere bite their nails and worry that the film might not turn out right, or, worse, might never be made.

I’m a huge fan of Tolkien’s books and I loved Peter Jackson’s trilogy — with reservations of course. Regardless of how much liberty he took with Tolkien’s story, Jackson’s films were brilliant works of popular art that never reached too high or stooped to low. Together, these films were by far the most excellent entertainment in decades, but, to be honest, as much as I loved Jackson’s trilogy, I’m not that excited about “The Hobbit.” Del Toro has proven that he can make both brilliant works of cinematic art and jaw dropping failures. Pan’s Labyrinth is a great film. Hellboy 2? Not so much. I’ve got a feeling that “Hobbit” will be somewhere in the middle. What makes me sick is this mentality we filmgoers have developed. We seem to revolve our lives around the release of films like “The Hobbit” and in the process we limit the art of Cinema to a live-action landscape for our favorite books, comics, and video games to be played out in.

Because of this rabid fandom mentality, adaptations of popular books and comic characters are making the most money. Subsequently, these movies get the most hype, and overall, the most screen time per year. The escalation of these kinds of films is ruining the way in which we watch movies. No longer do we say: “Star Wars? What’s that about?” Instead it’s “I loved that as a kid! I wonder which villain they’ll use” In a sense, the franchise has ruined the joy of original cinema.

I like what the Inventor in Johnson’s “Rasselas” says: “Nothing will ever be attempted, if all possible objections must be first overcome.” Sure, telling a brand new story, one with no tie-in to a kids books or a comic series might not make the most money, but it’s a start. Everyone thought George Lucas was crazy, but he created a timeless film that people still love today. Where are the new stories? Why do we keep having to rehash ideas that were used to make a quick buck on newsstands back in the 20s and 30s? The comic book and the novel are both great storytelling forms, but so is cinema. Let’s joyfully make and watch new cinematic stories and quit worrying about whether Sir Ian Mckellen will reprise his role, and who will play Bilbo Baggins.

I’m going to enjoy God’s gift of cinema and make my own movies, and quit worrying how Del Toro makes his.

A Question of Violence

As a christian filmmaker, I’ve always struggled with portraying violence in films. On one hand, violence is an integral part of conflict, which is part and parcel of what storytelling is about. To portray a realistic world, one where sin prevails, violence is essential. On the other hand, as a follower of Christ I am commanded to not glorify sin. Glorifying a product of sin is glorifying sin. By portraying violence in an exalted, emphasized manner, one that focuses on the violence as entertainment rather than as an aspect of story conflict, an artist is committing sin. Destroying the human body, a body that we are told is “The image of God”, solely for entertainment, is a deeply disturbing concept to me. This is why I hate films like “Saw” and “Hostel”. Last year I watched a short film on studentfilmmakers.com that aped the style of these films. I was troubled by what I saw and sent this message:

The film “Murdergenic” on the Summer Shorts ’07 contest page is EXTREMELY
offensive. Its portrayal of the twisted destruction of human life is
inappropriate for an educational website. I respectfully request its
removal.

Deeply disturbed,
Sean Anderson

I had not heard back from anyone at studentfilmmakers.com, and until recently, I had forgotten I ever sent such a message. Until today, when a representative finally replied:

Was it for example something not as evil but still along the lines of the
“…twisted destruction of human life is inappropriate…” as the
destruction of the life of the most and only devoted King of Eternity when
he walked the earth as a man and was nailed to a cross?

Truly
Kim

I’m not sure if Kim is a Christian. She might have visited my website and realized that I was. She makes an interesting point though. If Christ died such a terrible death on the cross, why can’t we portray similar death in our art? She doesn’t really address the film in question though. Here’s my reply:

Hey Kim,

I remember making this comment almost a year ago. I’d forgotten I wrote it. Thanks for getting back to me though. If I were you, I would have just ignored me. As I recall, the video in question was of an extended scene of torture, mostly mental, ending with a man brutally murdering a young woman, then, in the next scene, committing suicide. As far as I could tell, the filmmakers weren’t making any deep comments about sin or death, they were just emulating their depraved elders responsible for the Saw and Hostel franchises.

As a Christian, I understand the importance of violence. Christ’s death was the most violent and painful death anyone could ever face. Christ died for us, and it was only through such a severe sacrifice that he could pay for our sin. As a Christian I have the responsibility to remember and dwell upon that death, in all its ugliness, so as to worship Christ even more for what He did for me. But as a Christian, I also have the responsibility to create art that is not celebrating the sin that Christ died to cover. Exploiting a scene of such horrendous violence and doing so in such a graphic way has no place in my life. As a filmmaker I believe I should realistically portray the sin in this world, but not in such a way that would glorify that sin. I feel that this film, as well as the majority of slasher and horror films being produced today, glorify and celebrate sin.

These students have as much a right to make this film as I have to complain about it. We live in a free country, and I am proud of that fact. The truth is, this film deeply troubled me. I had trouble sleeping at night, even thinking clearly in class. I thought that if I was so painfully affected, others would be as well, and I wanted the staff at your website to consider this.

Thank you for your time,

Sean Anderson