The 10th of July

Last week I was invited along with the crew I’m working with this summer to an anunal 10th of July party. I was a little confused until my friend explained that the family that throws the party schedules it on the weekend after the 4th so that more people can come. There must have been up to two hundred people there. There was good food, a hay ride, a bluegrass band, and one of the coolest and longest fireworks displays I’ve ever seen! I brought my HV20 with, and I just finished editing the footage. Click here to watch it.

Pen-EE Results

I got my first roll of film back from shooting with my new Olympus Pen-EE, and I wasn’t very impressed. Most of the shots were extremely overexposed. I’ve seen other photographers work with the Pen-EE online and I can only guess that mine is defective. It might be the shutter, it’s a bit sticky. The blur is caused by the shutter, the only way I can keep it from sticking is by jamming down hard on the shutter release whenever I take a picture, which causes the camera to shake. Oh well.

These two shots came out okay, in an impressionistic sort of way. I’m really intrigued by the whole half frame thing. If I ever get a half-frame camera that works, I want to try taking side by side exposures that complement each other.

Pen-EEs and Selenium Meters

I was doing some prop hunting with my art direction teacher this weekend. We visited an extremely run-down junk store. The quiet and almost toothless proprietor took us into a side room and showed us a box full of old cameras. Most of them were broken Polaroids, but down at the bottom was one of these little beauties.

The Olympus Pen-EE was first produced in 1961. It’s a half-frame camera, which means it shoots only half a frame of 35mm film at a time. The man at the junk store let me buy it for eight dollars. considering these types of models seem to be going for between fifty and a hundred dollars on ebay, I got a good deal!

The Pen-EE is one of the earlier automatic exposure cameras. When set on automatic it uses a selenium meter placed in a honeycomb-like array around the lens to decides the aperture. This is what camerapedia.org has to say about selenium meters:

“The electric parts of such a meter are an electromagnetic measuring instrument which is connected to anode and cathode of a selenium photo cell that produces more or less electric power when exposed to more or less light. The optical part of such a meter is a window in front of the photo cell’s light sensitive side. The window’s surface is usually structured like a honeycomb made of convex lenses. This type of window helps to bundle the light coming from the direction to where the photo cell is directed. The mechanical part of a selenium meter is an analog calculator which accepts exposure value and film speed as input parameters for showing the possible aperture/shutter speed combinations for correct exposure.”

I find this all so fascinating! It’s so cool to find almost 50 year old technology that still functions today without batteries. And my new camera definitely still functions. When I set it to auto and try to take a picture in a dark room, it flashes a little orange gel in the viewfinder and it won’t snap a picture. Definitely an outside point-and-shoot. I can’t wait to shoot a roll!

Sugar Mountain: Pulling a “Philip Bloom”

Three years ago I bumped into Philip Bloom’s website. I was greatly inspired by his work, especially the way he captured a location on video so that I felt I’d been there. His Canon HV20 test film inspired me to purchase an HV20 of my own, and I’ve been loving it ever since. Early this Spring my friend Mike and I went skiing at Sugar Mountain in North Carolina. Mike skied while I captured the locale on tape. I just finished editing my footage and I must say that I feel I have successfully pulled a “Philip Bloom.”

Check out “Sugar Mountain” by clicking Here.

Mr. Toad Syndrome: Toy Cameras

I think I have a minor case of Mr. Toad Syndrome. I’ve been told that symptoms of this disease include a constant changing of pursuits, an incurable obsession with the current pursuit being pursued, and a total rejection of old pursuits in favor of new ones. Luckily, symptom three has yet to strike. Though I do burn through a lot of random hobbies, at least I hold onto to every one I acquire to some degree. My newest pursuit is toy cameras. This website got me hooked.

Toy cameras are generally vintage cameras from the fifties and sixties that are made of plastic. They have plastic lenses, often use medium format film, and come in a bewildering variety of shapes and sizes. Just type “toy camera” into an ebay search. You’ll see what I mean. The most loved and adored toy of toy camera users is the Holga, a late bloomer that has tons of awful deficiencies including vignetting and light leaks. All these flaws culminate in a wonderfully distorted, dream-like image that is extremely addicting to shoot and collect. I was considering buying one when a friend offered to give me one of his old “toys.”

Introducing the Six Twenty Sunbeam, an off-brand TLR camera manufactured in Chicago.

Twin Lens Reflex cameras are really neat, both to look at and to use. The smaller bottom lens takes the picture. The larger top lens capture the image aimed at and projects it onto a ground glass on top of the camera. Kind of a primitive LCD screen.

The upside, or downside depending on how you look at it, is that you have to hold the camera below your face and look down to take a picture. I think it’s a blast!

I’m still cleaning up this old and slightly damaged camera. I’ll get some film for it soon and post some pics once I get them developed. Whoo hoo, what an absolutely glorious, scrumtuous way to take photographs! Toot toot!

Are We Human?

Pay my respects to grace and virtue
Send my condolences to good
Give my regards to soul and romance,
They always did the best they could
And so long to devotion
You taught me everything I know
Wave goodbye
Wish me well..
You’ve gotta let me go

Lyrics – The Killers

The Epic Quest of The Book Hunter and the Tragic Demise of Suprema

In the tradition of a generation of bloggers, I will now depart on a long-winded discussion of some of my hobbies.

I love book hunting! There are two thrift stores right off campus and both of them sell softcovers for fifty cents a piece! It’s really the thrill of the hunt that I love the most, digging through dusty piles of outdated computer manuals, crummy romance fiction, and hundreds of worn copies of Clancy, Crichton, Grisham, Ludlum, Koontz, and King. On a shelf of hundreds of books there may only be one I want, but finding it is half the fun!

I went book hunting today and brought back five treasures for two dollars and fifty cents! Brave New World, Howard’s End, Cormac McCarthy’s The Crossing, Tennyson’s Idylls of the King, and The Inheritors by William Golding, who also wrote Lord of the Flies. I started reading The Inheritors, which is about cavemen facing new, more human rivals. Definitely against my worldview, but Golding’s portrayal of darkened humanity seeking light is beautiful.

I was to the third chapter at Starbucks, drinking a free drink, when a furious thunder shower hit. I stayed longer than I wanted to, till the storm blew over, then walked to CVS to pick up a battery for my recently acquired $10 camera.

My Suprema has been kind of a pain lately. I like the image it produces, but its tiny and useless LCD screen sucks up all the battery life. The battery died after only a few uses and I discovered at CVS that buying a new one would cost me more than half of what the camera is worth! While I was trying to think of a solution to my dilemma my eyes fell on a little Vivitar mini digital camera the store was selling, the exact model I had years ago that I loved so much. $9, no dumb battery-sucking features, a sturdier design, and it runs ten times longer on a cheap triple A!

I’m sad to say that I purchased it, and that my little blue Suprema is being retired. I miss you already little guy . . . NOT! Here are some test pics I’ve shot already. A little blurrier and more pixelated, but I can live with it.

Hobbit News

Two of my favorite film directors, Guillermo Del Torro and Peter Jackson are working together to create a true-to-the-book film adaptation of J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit. I just found some fragments of an interview the two did for Empire Magazine. Take a look:

Jackson: We do cover some of the events earlier, like Thrain, Thorin’s father, and we’re sort of fleshing out the Hobbit and expanding it sideways, up and down. We just decided it would be a mistake to try to cram everything into one movie. The essential brief was to do The Hobbit and it allows us to make the Hobbit in a little more of the style, if you like, of the trilogy, too.
Del Toro: To make a movie of the Hobbit that didn’t go over three hours.
Jackson: You would be rushing along…
Del Toro: You would be losing iconic moments. The animated version avoids Beorn, who is a great character, and some people always feel that you should lose the Spiders (of Mirkwood), or this or that. We wanted to keep every iconic moment that was in the book and give it some weight.

Empire: How are you going to handle the dwarves, many of whom aren’t fleshed out in the book?
Del Toro: There is a very specific function that Gimli had in the trilogy. And technically and expressively, the dwarves in The Hobbit serve another. They have to become valiant, brave, sometimes funny – and yes, all of those were in Gimli, but there are moments in which the dwarves have to be tragic, or they have to be incredibly moving. Those dwarves, physically and dramatically, will work like three-dimensional characters that will as soon make you laugh as they will make you fear for their lives, or they will move you. Hopefully to tears, in some instances…
Jackson: We’re going to choose five or six, pretty similar to the ones that Tolkien spends a bit more time on in the book, and develop some quite interesting relationships between them and Bilbo. We don’t want them to be just Thorin plus 12 comedic sidekicks.

Jackson: What I think everybody has to get right in their minds is that we’re creating a Middle-earth that’s pretty much the same as the trilogy’s Middle-earth. Hobbiton is going to look like the same place. Hobbits are going to look the same. But it’s another guy going in with his own filmmaking style. That’s why I think this could be a better idea for him to direct these films than me. Let’s all see what somebody else does with Middle-earth. Let’s go in there with another director and another set of lenses and another cameraman, and see what they do with it. I think that’s exciting. He’s not pretending to be me. People have got to get that into their heads.

I’m glad they’re going for continuity but not compromiseing the book. Also, it’s good to hear that they’re going to focus on developing the dwarves, something that they had trouble with in the LOTR series with Gimli. Maybe they’ll use less prosthetics? After reading this I’m a lot more excited about this film than I was before!

Bloomfields

Bloomfields

Fields of honor lie the wrecked
Aging bones the stones respect
Planted seeds to resurrect
Blossom bodies back to breath

Dust-turned flesh plagued with defect
Image hid, His to perfect
Perfect glory to reflect
Image mirrors underground

Those He chose to Him elect
No blot of sin will He detect
His righteous wrath His blood deflects
His blood rebuilds mankind

Trumpet and the roaring wind
Life from death, the death to sin
Pearly gates to enter in
Graves are temporary housing

It’s Finally Here!

The only diference is, if you’re stuck under a thousand-pound boulder or chasing a flying sofa across a vast prehistoric plain, and there’s no wi-fi, you can’t access any content.

Human Interest

My Grandpa recently passed away. After the funeral we were looking through shoeboxes full of his old photos and I couldn’t help noticing a response I kept having. I was fascinated by all the photos of people, wether I recognized them or not, but whenever I would come to a pile of nature shots, or vacation photos full of architecture and tourist attractions, I would impatiently flip through them until I encountered more human faces.

My photography teacher stressed this principle to me back in freshman year, but I was still surprised to discover it for myself: human interest is key. No matter how interesting you think a building or an animal or a tree is now, the only pictures that will count in the future will be of people. People are important to us. If we know them in the present, we will be fascinated by their younger selves. If we don’t know them, we will be filled with curiosity: who were they? What were they like. Photos we take of ourselves today will help inform people tomorrow of how we lived.

I was struck by this cultural aspect while looking at old picture of my Grandma’s father and his family who immigrated from Sweden. They were lively and loved sport; the girls played ukuleles, the boys wore their dapper American suits and coats proudly. I never had the chance to meet these descendants of mine, but by looking at their lives in photographic print, I have a connection to them that I would otherwise never have had.

In this digital age we have a great opportunity to capture our lives for the future. Digital cameras give us better quality and greater quantity, but there is now a much greater danger of losing our precious pictures to the ravages of time and constant upgrading technology. As long as we vigilantly watch our hard drives for signs of crashing and always, always copy our digital photos to new and better storage means, we should be fine, but I still think the best way to preserve memories is in a shoebox.